Re: drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.c:1209: `CMSPAR' undeclared

Re: drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.c:1209: `CMSPAR' undeclared

[Olaf Hering]

 On Tue, Oct 14, Greg KH wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:55:43PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > Greg,
> >
> > maybe I asked that once, but:
> > is there a fix?
> >
> >
> >   CC [M]  drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.o
> > drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.c: In function `firm_setup_port':
> > drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.c:1209: `CMSPAR' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> That's defined in <asm/termbits.h>
>
> What platform are you building this on?

I'm building on ppc32. A grep showed that alpha, ppc, and ppc64 do not
have this define. google wasnt very helpful, 'CMSPAR ppc' shows one
patch to add it and acm.c which just defines it to 0.

So the question is, what should be changed?

whitehead.c to use something else?
whitehead.c to add arch specific defines?
asm/termbits.h to add some dummy defines?
disable whitehead.o for alpha, ppc, ppc64 in Kconfig?


--
USB is for mice, FireWire is for men!

sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

Re: drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.c:1209: `CMSPAR' undeclared

[Greg KH]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 09:22:49PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
>  On Tue, Oct 14, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2003 at 06:55:43PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > maybe I asked that once, but:
> > > is there a fix?
> > >
> > >
> > >   CC [M]  drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.o
> > > drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.c: In function `firm_setup_port':
> > > drivers/usb/serial/whiteheat.c:1209: `CMSPAR' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >
> > That's defined in <asm/termbits.h>
> >
> > What platform are you building this on?
>
> I'm building on ppc32. A grep showed that alpha, ppc, and ppc64 do not
> have this define. google wasnt very helpful, 'CMSPAR ppc' shows one
> patch to add it and acm.c which just defines it to 0.
>
> So the question is, what should be changed?

Fix up the archs that do not define this?  That would probably be the
best thing to do.

thanks,

greg k-h

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/