From: linas@austin.ibm.com
To: Christian <evil@g-house.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: ppc32 lockups with 2.6
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:57:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031110175740.A32176@forte.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FB01392.60500@g-house.de>; from evil@g-house.de on Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:39:14PM +0100
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 11:39:14PM +0100, Christian wrote:
> linas@austin.ibm.com wrote:
> > I'd suggest getting the KDB kernel patches, and then poking around to
> > see what the system was doing when it locked up.
>
> kdb, hm, i'll see if i can handle this. would some output from gdb help too?
kdb is a built-in kernel debugger. gdb is useless for this case,
although kgdb could be another alternative.
> > What were the stack traces? does it always lock up in the same routine?
>
> the debugger will show, as nothing else showed up and even SysReq was
> not working anymore.
Hmm, that's bad ... does sysreq work before the lockup?
> > What line of code was it
> > executiing when it did that?
No, I meant in the kernel, the output of the kdb 'bt' command, which
shows what the kernel was doing when kdb was entereed. But if sysreq
really doesn't work, then theres a chance that kdb won't either, and
that means ... hmm...
--linas
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-10 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-02 20:31 ppc32 lockups with 2.6 Christian Kujau
2003-11-06 21:34 ` Christian
2003-11-10 18:50 ` linas
2003-11-10 20:32 ` Tom Rini
2003-11-10 22:39 ` Christian
2003-11-10 23:57 ` linas [this message]
2003-11-11 0:25 ` Christian
2003-11-11 15:36 ` Tom Rini
2003-11-13 0:59 ` Christian Kujau
2003-11-13 17:47 ` Tom Rini
2003-11-13 23:56 ` Christian Kujau
2003-11-14 15:57 ` Tom Rini
2003-11-18 12:33 ` Christian Kujau
2003-11-18 14:14 ` Christian Kujau
2003-11-21 15:25 ` Christian Kujau
2003-11-21 17:54 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031110175740.A32176@forte.austin.ibm.com \
--to=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=evil@g-house.de \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).