From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
From: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram.es>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:41:14 +0100
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>,
	Dale Farnsworth <dale@farnsworth.org>,
	Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: MPC5200 Patches
Message-ID: <20031112114114.GA8526@iram.es>
References: <20031112094914.0D24FC5F59@atlas.denx.de> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0311121059070.885-100000@waterleaf.sonytel.be>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0311121059070.885-100000@waterleaf.sonytel.be>
Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>


On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:59:59AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > In message <Pine.GSO.4.21.0311121029220.885-100000@waterleaf.sonytel.be> you wrote:
> > >
> > > >   We have drivers/i2c/i2c-algo-8xx.c, so maybe we should have
> > > >   i2c-algo-5xxx.c instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.c ?
> > > >
> > > >   There is include/linux/i2c-algo-8xx.h - how about
> > > >   i2c-algo-5xxx.h instead of i2c-algo-m5xxx.h ?
> > ...
> > > What's done in include/asm-ppc/ isn't that important for the
> > > outside (non-PPC) world, but i2c-algo-5xxx.c may be a too generic
> > > name...
> >
> > Which name do you recommend to cover the MGT5100 and MPC5200 (and
> > probably other MPC5xxx) processors?
>
> i2c-algo-m5xxx.c, like the original?

Hmmm, dont't repeated x have a tendency to trigger spam filters
(especially the dumbest ones)?

Why not 5nnn or 5xyz?

	Gabriel

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/