From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: "Joao Vicente" <joao.vicente@spectel.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: RAMDISK problem
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:45:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031112194554.7EE13C5F59@atlas.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:15:46 GMT." <DEF39A0710293E489D45B10E06645CBD026719AB@dub-msx1.spectelcorp.com>
Dear Joao,
in message <DEF39A0710293E489D45B10E06645CBD026719AB@dub-msx1.spectelcorp.com> you wrote:
>
> The SDRAM parameters used for initialisation have been fully verified
Parameters is one thing, the init sequence is another story. Boith
are required, or you will see strange crashes as soon as the system
starts using burst mode heavily.
> with this board, as we have used them with another RTOS, without any
> problem.
That does not mean anything. Really. We have seen boards that used to
run pSOS+ for years without problem, but would crash reliably under
Linux. The problems went away after fixing the RAM initialization.
Your problem is a FAQ on the PPCboot / U-Boot mailing lists.
> Aditionaly I ran the u-boot mtest utility on sections of the RAM to
> ensure the configuration was good.
Again, that doesn't mean anything, as this test performs simple read
/ write cycles. It will not cause any accesses in burst mode.
> I believe that rules out bad SDRAM configuration.
I disagree. I've seen this too many times before.
> I thought that could give me an idea if inflate was writing outside the
> valid
> virtual address range.
I think you're on the wrong track. But I may be wrong, of course.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
"Just Say No." - Nancy Reagan
"No." - Ronald Reagan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-12 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <DEF39A0710293E489D45B10E06645CBD026719AB@dub-msx1.spectelcorp.com>
2003-11-12 19:45 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2004-04-05 13:53 ramdisk problem 刘彩苹
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-20 20:10 RAMDISK problem VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE)
2003-11-20 15:34 Joao Vicente
2003-11-20 16:27 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-19 19:49 VanBaren, Gerald (AGRE)
2003-11-19 19:13 Joao Vicente
2003-11-12 21:01 Jean-Denis Boyer
2003-11-12 21:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-11-11 19:58 Steven Blakeslee
2003-11-11 15:44 Joao Vicente
2003-11-11 19:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2003-03-13 9:38 RAMDISK Problem Kamalesh B
2003-03-03 12:19 Kamalesh B
2003-03-03 12:30 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-13 15:20 Re: ramdisk problem somshekar chandrashekar kadam
2002-06-13 15:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-13 13:43 somshekar chandrashekar kadam
2002-06-13 13:54 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-13 11:14 somshekar chandrashekar kadam
2002-06-13 11:49 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031112194554.7EE13C5F59@atlas.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=joao.vicente@spectel.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).