From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: "Dale Farnsworth" Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 23:07:01 -0700 To: Wolfgang Denk , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: MPC5200 Patches Message-ID: <20031117060701.GA26252@zenos.farnsworth.org> References: <20031112151824.GC31581@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <20031116203318.21D9CC5F59@atlas.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20031116203318.21D9CC5F59@atlas.denx.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:33:13PM +0000, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom & Dale, > > OK, so the discussion has stopped. What's happening now? I sent our > stuff. Dale has added some modification. We have more works in the > queue. I think it makes little sense to continue without a common > code base. > > Can you give any estimates when something will go into a public tree, > and what this will be, and which tree? > > If there is any reason for you not to use the "common" trees (like > linuxppc_2_4_devel ?) yet, maybe we can at least put the current > state into a more dedicated tree like > bk://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_mgt5100 > > So that we can at least avoid to duplicate efforts while the work is > going on? Hi Wolfgang, Have you had a chance to test my merged patch? Any bug fixes? I don't think it's quite ready for linuxppc_2_4_devel, though it's close. Per your suggestion above, I created bk://source.mvista.com/linuxppc_2_4_mpc5200 It incorporates my merged patch with the following changes from the discussion in this thread: o s/CONFIG_5XXX/CONFIG_PPC_5xxx/ o s/i2c-algo-m5xxx.c/i2c-algo-ppc_5xxx.c/ o s/UBoot/U-Boot/ o s/M?5[xX][xX][xX]/MPC5xxx/ o s/m?5[xX][xX][xX]/mpc5xxx/ o changed default CONFIG_MPC5xxx_FLASH_SIZE to 0x1000000 I think the name changes are a definite improvement. Thanks to all for the input. Please try this new tree and submit patches against it. Thank you, -Dale Farnsworth ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/