From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Dale Farnsworth" Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 07:52:18 -0700 To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: MPC5200 Patches Message-ID: <20031118145218.GA8092@zenos.farnsworth.org> References: <20031117151948.GB30251@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <20031117160250.CD994C5F59@atlas.denx.de> <20031117162530.GD30251@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20031117162530.GD30251@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 04:25:30PM +0000, Tom Rini wrote: > It's just a name, and I've renamed it to -mpc5xxx (and changed all refs > ot MGT5100/MGT5200 to MPC5xxx or MPC5100 or MPC5200 (in talking with > Dale 'MGT' seems to be going away as naming, so..). As near as I can tell, the MGT5100 chip has been replaced by the MPC5200. Since the MGT5100 is essentially dead, there is no need to rename it to MPC5100. I think the MPC5200 came on the scene before the MGT5100 was used in any products (beyond Motorola's demo/eval platforms). If anyone is aware of any products using the MGT5100, please speak up. The MGT5100 doesn't merit our long-term support. -Dale Farnsworth ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/