From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:53:15 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tom Rini Cc: Wolfgang Denk , Dale Farnsworth , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: MPC5200 Patches Message-ID: <20031120115315.GA7411@lst.de> References: <20031117151948.GB30251@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> <20031117160250.CD994C5F59@atlas.denx.de> <20031117162530.GD30251@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20031117162530.GD30251@ip68-0-152-218.tc.ph.cox.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:25:30AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > This is a tree that we can check the initial MPC5xxx work into for 2.4, > make sure that it works and get Marcelo to take it. Then it can die. > And the older (linuxppc_2_4_mgt5100) can be archived and die. And the > new (linuxppc_2_4_mpc5200) tree should die now since it's only got > Dale's one patch in it, that I'm moving over. Umm, the code needs a rewrite before it's suitable for mainline. In it's current state is just bogus utter crap. The bestcomm API needs to go away and the dma engine used directly. ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/