From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Lee Braiden <jel@ntlworld.com>,
debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Would setting the CONFIG_RTC option break the powerpc kernel on your machine ?
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:33:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031222163315.GC10841@stop.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031222162601.GA9021@iliana>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:26:01PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 09:10:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > Also, the todc code knows about many RTC chips, among them, the MC146818
> > > seems to be the one used by the rtc.h stuff, and seems to be a generic
> > > legacy RTC chip or something. he one i have, builtin the VIA VT8231
> > > southbridge is said to be called VT82887, altough i have no docs of
> > > those, but the header files found in 2.6 concord. But i seem to have
> > > some additional DATE_ALARM, MONTH_ALARM and CENTURY_FIELD registers not
> > > found int the MC146818 header file.
> >
> > I appologize since I ramble a bit too much. For 2.4, the best fix is
> > (1) above. For 2.6 however, it should be possible to remove chrp_time.c
> > and use todc_time.c instead (it is self-contained, wrt nvram read/write,
> > iirc) and do some sub-casing to pick the right RTC chip code to use.
> > For example on PReP we still case between the two different chips, and
> > just call todc_init (iirc) with a different param. Or something along
> > those lines.
>
> Ok, i have looked more, and the MC146818 is ok for my box. don't know
> about other chrp boxes though.
>
> There is also the todc code in the 2.4 tree though, so it should also be
> possible to do it this way, or would it not ?
It would be possible, but it would be more intrusive for a stable
series.
> Anyway, i will submit a patch against 2.4.23 (from linuxppc_2_4, but it
> may also include the pegasos patches Ben has had no time to checkin)
> tomorrow.
>
> Next thing i need is a solution for builtin initrd's of bigger sizes.
> 1.4Mo seem to work, but 2.2Mo break somehow (no init found, but if the
> initrd is uncompressed to some partition, it work fine).
which code subset under arch/ppc/boot does pegasos use? Does it really
have OpenFirmware? I've booted large ramdisks in the past from the
arch/ppc/boot/simple/ stuff (And prep/) but I believe that chrp/pmac
place the initrd at a location high in memory, have holes to deal with,
etc, etc, while simple/ and prep/ (more or less) just ignore the
firmware once it's up.
--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-22 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20031216105656.GA5291@iliana>
[not found] ` <1071642293.753.414.camel@gaston>
[not found] ` <200312170717.36564.jel@ntlworld.com>
[not found] ` <1071646057.6370.482.camel@gaston>
2003-12-17 9:51 ` Would setting the CONFIG_RTC option break the powerpc kernel on your machine ? Sven Luther
2003-12-17 10:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-12-17 15:45 ` Segher Boessenkool
2003-12-17 16:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-12-17 17:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2003-12-17 16:47 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-17 16:56 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-17 17:06 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-17 17:10 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-17 17:24 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-19 11:40 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-19 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-22 13:45 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-22 16:10 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-22 16:26 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-22 16:33 ` Tom Rini [this message]
2003-12-22 16:48 ` Sven Luther
2003-12-22 16:59 ` Tom Rini
2003-12-22 17:02 ` Mark Guertin
2003-12-22 17:27 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 6:54 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 7:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 7:43 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 7:47 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 8:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 9:53 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 10:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 10:54 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 11:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-07 11:53 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-07 18:34 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-07 7:51 ` Ethan Benson
2004-01-07 11:27 ` Volunteer needed : " Sven Luther
2004-01-07 12:28 ` Ethan Benson
2004-01-07 14:47 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-08 7:27 ` Ethan Benson
2004-01-08 15:53 ` Tom Rini
2004-01-08 17:47 ` Sven Luther
2004-01-08 21:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-01-08 21:57 ` Sven Luther
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031222163315.GC10841@stop.crashing.org \
--to=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org \
--cc=jel@ntlworld.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=sven.luther@wanadoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).