linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: PPC32: Add support for the OpenPIC register set to be in BE mode.
       [not found] <200401032002.i03K23iM024298@hera.kernel.org>
@ 2004-01-05 14:02 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
  2004-01-05 15:28   ` Anton Blanchard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2004-01-05 14:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Rini; +Cc: Linux/PPC Development


On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.1356.1.1, 2004/01/02 08:51:22-07:00, trini@kernel.crashing.org
>
> 	PPC32: Add support for the OpenPIC register set to be in BE mode.
>
>
> # This patch includes the following deltas:
> #	           ChangeSet	1.1356  -> 1.1356.1.1
> #	arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c	1.25    -> 1.26
> #
>
>  open_pic.c |   10 +++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>
> diff -Nru a/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c b/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c
> --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c	Sat Jan  3 12:02:04 2004
> +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c	Sat Jan  3 12:02:04 2004
> @@ -166,13 +166,21 @@
>  {
>  	u_int val;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_OPENPIC_BE
> +	val = in_be32(addr);
> +#else
>  	val = in_le32(addr);
> +#endif
>  	return val;
>  }

Wouldn't it be better to #define openpic_in() and openpic_out() macros, so you
need the #ifdef at one spot only?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: PPC32: Add support for the OpenPIC register set to be in BE mode.
  2004-01-05 14:02 ` PPC32: Add support for the OpenPIC register set to be in BE mode Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2004-01-05 15:28   ` Anton Blanchard
  2004-01-05 15:41     ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anton Blanchard @ 2004-01-05 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: Tom Rini, Linux/PPC Development


> > diff -Nru a/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c b/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c
> > --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c	Sat Jan  3 12:02:04 2004
> > +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c	Sat Jan  3 12:02:04 2004
> > @@ -166,13 +166,21 @@
> >  {
> >  	u_int val;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_OPENPIC_BE
> > +	val = in_be32(addr);
> > +#else
> >  	val = in_le32(addr);
> > +#endif
> >  	return val;
> >  }
>
> Wouldn't it be better to #define openpic_in() and openpic_out() macros, so you
> need the #ifdef at one spot only?

Or grab the bit out of the ppc64 openpic code that detects this at runtime
and get rid of the CONFIG option completely :)

Anton

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: PPC32: Add support for the OpenPIC register set to be in BE mode.
  2004-01-05 15:28   ` Anton Blanchard
@ 2004-01-05 15:41     ` Tom Rini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2004-01-05 15:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anton Blanchard; +Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven, Linux/PPC Development


On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 02:28:30AM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:

> > > diff -Nru a/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c b/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c
> > > --- a/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c	Sat Jan  3 12:02:04 2004
> > > +++ b/arch/ppc/kernel/open_pic.c	Sat Jan  3 12:02:04 2004
> > > @@ -166,13 +166,21 @@
> > >  {
> > >  	u_int val;
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_OPENPIC_BE
> > > +	val = in_be32(addr);
> > > +#else
> > >  	val = in_le32(addr);
> > > +#endif
> > >  	return val;
> > >  }
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to #define openpic_in() and openpic_out() macros, so you
> > need the #ifdef at one spot only?

I suppose we should do it like that for 2.6 (note made).

> Or grab the bit out of the ppc64 openpic code that detects this at runtime
> and get rid of the CONFIG option completely :)

I assume you mean the broken_ipi_registers bit (I only see used in one
spot in what I've got locall) ? I think maybe with some thought it could
work (it's needed in openpic_{read,write} as well for these machines,
prpmc800 and e500, iirc).

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-05 15:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <200401032002.i03K23iM024298@hera.kernel.org>
2004-01-05 14:02 ` PPC32: Add support for the OpenPIC register set to be in BE mode Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-01-05 15:28   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-01-05 15:41     ` Tom Rini

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).