Re: linuxppc trees, what is going on ?

[Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:21:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:35:14AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 06:18:27PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:06:31AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:32:17AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, anyway linuxppc_2_4 is supposed to be dead. But my point was, from
> > > > > which TAG should i extract kernels from the linuxppc-2.4 to make debian
> > > > > packages ? I tried the v2.4.24 tag, which seemed ok, but the version was
> > > > > still 2.4.24-rc1. I guess this was a problem due to the haste of the
> > > > > 2.4.24 release or something, but it would be nice if it was clear which
> > > > > tag we should export.
> > > >
> > > > There is no tag you can use to do this.  Just like how 'v2.4.24' in the
> > > > old linuxppc_2_4* trees would get you 2.4.24 w/o any PPC changes, the
> > > > same will happen here.
> > >
> > > This is getting more complicated ...
> > >
> > > Ok, let's say, tomorrow i need to release a debian 2.4.24 powerpc
> > > package, what should i take for this, and which tag/date/whatever should
> > > i use.
> >
> > First, do a bk help changes.  I mention this since I believe the
> > behavior of -e will change, or has changed.  Then do a 'bk changes' such
> > that you see all merge changesets.  Then just find that one that
> > corresponds to when the merge of Marcelo's tree that contained at least
> > v2.4.24 came in.  If there are changes after v2.4.24, you will have to
> > back these out from your patch manually (filterdiff or interdiff can probably
> > help here).
> >
> > Paul, do you want to start adding tags to the linuxppc-2.4 tree?
>
> I am trully baffled here, i don't know what is going on, but then maybe
> it is my little comprehension of how bk works.
>
> I did pull the linux-2.4 tree, and exported the v2.4.24 tag. I did the
> same for the linuxppc-2.4 tree, and diffed the two exported trees. Both
> were exactly the same.

That is correct. A tag has the same values (set of ChangeSets)
regardless of the tree (simpilication).

> Could it be possible to add proper tags in the future to the
> linuxppc-2.4 tree ?

If I do any updates, I'll try and remember to do this.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/