From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 12:06:37 -0800 From: Eugene Surovegin To: hp Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Development Environment: Message-ID: <20040120200637.GB32018@gate.ebshome.net> References: <20040120195133.50035.qmail@web20416.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20040120195133.50035.qmail@web20416.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 11:51:33AM -0800, hp wrote: > I am doing a research on what are the "best" or "most popular" tools to use > in an embedded linux development environment right now. I know there are a > lot of expert embedded linux developers in this news group. I would really > appreciated it if you would take a few seconds to let me know what you are > using or what you think is good to use for the following: > > compiler: _________ GCC 2.95.3 (from MVL 2.1), plan to upgrade to 3.x series shortly > deployment: _________ ???? what do you mean ? > code management (i.e. cvs): _________ Perforce > kernel debugger: _________ BDI, RiscWatch but mostly printk + custom kernel tracer similar to LTT. > bootrom debugger: _________ BDI, RiscWatch I'm not sure these are the _best_ tools though :) Eugene. ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/