From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 21:15:35 -0800
From: Xiaoshan Zuo <xzuo@vinesystech.com>
To: Huailin Chen <chen_huailin@yahoo.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: any one use 750fx/MV64360
Message-ID: <20040122051535.GA15242@vinesystech.com>
References: <400F1270.7000107@vinesystech.com> <20040122034730.55118.qmail@web21409.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <20040122034730.55118.qmail@web21409.mail.yahoo.com>
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


Thanks for the comments. Those are certainly good points. What
OS did you use? Any suggestions on the Linux kernel to use?
BTW, your website is just interesting.

Xiaoshan

**** Huailin Chen wrote ****
> My 2 cents:
>
> I happened to use all your options these years:--(.
>
> 750fx + 64260
> it should be good enough if you don't have
> MP(Multi-CPU) demand for running smp-os on top of it.
> The reason is obivous: 750fx is G3. The MEI protocol
> may not be prefered if your system happens to be a
> high-end applicances.
>
> 750fx + 64360
>
> if you do want to stay 750 and need SMP, you may have
> to use 64360. Check out Marvell FAE people to
> understand their Arbiter part, which have some fixes
> for SMP support. If you have legacy issue, note that
> some tiny porting work needed for 64360 part.
>
> 7447 + 64260
> No one would go for this option
>
> 7447 + 64360
>
> Well, G4+ MES(R)I is born to support SMP system. So,
> if you concern this part, do go for it. One thing you
> need talk to your hardware board group is: Powerp
> Consumption. If you guys are able to live with it, go
> for it:-).
>
> Also, if you have legacy codes under IBM 750-based
> system, please pay high alert on driver part. For
> example, Out of Order issue when under Non-Cachable
> and Guard......One missing will make your driver all
> srew up. For more detail, you are welcome to talk to
> me.
>
> Good luck,
> Huailin Chen
> www.xtrj.org
>
>
>
>
> --- Xiaoshan Zuo <xzuo@vinesystech.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are planning design a custom board. The preferred
> > cpu is IBM 750FX,
> > the bridge is going to be Marvell 64360. Depending
> > on the software
> > support, we may alter our plan to use either
> > 750FX/64260 or Motorola
> > 7447/64360/64260. It seems that 64360 is not
> > supported in stock kernel,
> > there is galieo tree for that, but I am not sure the
> > code is really
> > stable. Anyone has experience using 750fx/64360?
> > Which version of
> > gcc/kernel/u-boot should I use? If that is not a
> > good option, then how
> > about 750FX/64260 or Motorola 7447/64360/64260? Any
> > suggestions/comments
> > will be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Xiaoshan
> >
> >
>
>
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/