From: Gerhard Jaeger <g.jaeger@sysgo.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: IBM 440GX performance (was Re: IBM 440GX, Ocotea...)
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 09:02:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200403250902.54382.g.jaeger@sysgo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040324234025.GA11675@gate.ebshome.net>
Hi Eugene,
thanks for the benchmarks, but I was somewhat surprised to find results with
enabled L2 cache. Does this mean, that there is some existing revision
with working L2 cache, or is it only enabled to demonstrate how fast it could
be if this thing is working correctly?
Ciao,
Gerhard
On Thursday 25 March 2004 00:40, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:59:56AM +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> > BTW, do you or somebody else have some performance figures
> > (LMbench?) for the GX compared to the other processor.
>
> I did some testing on our custom 440GP/GX hardware.
>
> Each system has 512M of RAM, SCSI disk was used for disk and FS testing (in
> RAID-1 configuration but without a mirror drive).
>
> I used NFS root, host - P4 1.6GHz, SuSE 8.0, 100Mbit switch connection.
>
> 440GP system was running at 400MHz/133MHz, 440GX - 500MHz/166MHz. For 440GX
> I did testing with L2C disabled and enabled.
>[SNIPSNAP]
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-25 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-23 11:02 IBM 440GX, Ocotea Wolfgang Grandegger
2004-03-23 16:03 ` Tolunay Orkun
2004-03-23 16:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-03-23 16:57 ` Jaap-Jan Boor
2004-03-23 17:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-03-23 18:24 ` Dan Malek
2004-03-24 8:07 ` Jaap-Jan Boor
2004-03-24 22:25 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-25 7:57 ` Jaap-Jan Boor
2004-03-25 19:40 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-25 21:14 ` Tolunay Orkun
2004-03-25 21:20 ` Tom Rini
2004-03-25 21:23 ` Tolunay Orkun
2004-03-25 12:12 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-03-25 13:16 ` Jaap-Jan Boor
2004-03-23 18:31 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-03-24 8:49 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2004-03-24 8:59 ` IBM 440GX performance (was Re: IBM 440GX, Ocotea...) Wolfgang Grandegger
2004-03-24 12:24 ` USB problem on 2.4.20 song sam
[not found] ` <20040324234025.GA11675@gate.ebshome.net>
2004-03-25 8:02 ` Gerhard Jaeger [this message]
2004-03-25 19:43 ` IBM 440GX performance (was Re: IBM 440GX, Ocotea...) Eugene Surovegin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200403250902.54382.g.jaeger@sysgo.com \
--to=g.jaeger@sysgo.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).