From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 20:43:53 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: John Whitney Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Proposed changes to io.h Message-ID: <20040331184353.GA20510@lst.de> References: <49B568CB-832A-11D8-9FF0-000A95A07384@sands-edge.com> <20040331181852.GA20127@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 01:40:15PM -0500, John Whitney wrote: > Just out of curiosity, are there replacements or are you just supposed > to do good-practice things like store the dma address returned by > pci_alloc_consistent/dma_alloc_coherent? The latter. (or pci_map* / dma_map*) > >Standard-naming for those are readq/writeq afaik > > Specifically, the MTD code looks for __raw_readll/writell, which is why > I used the convention I did. I'll be happy to update the names if > desired. What mtd code? hch@bird:/repo/repo/linux-2.5$ grep __raw_readll include/asm-*/io.h | wc -l 0 hch@bird:/repo/repo/linux-2.5$ grep __raw_readq include/asm-*/io.h | wc -l 22 ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/