From: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>,
John Whitney <jwhitney-linuxppc@sands-edge.com>,
Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Problems with dma_alloc_coherent()
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 13:49:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040401134953.C27472@home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040401185956.GB3786@gate.ebshome.net>; from ebs@ebshome.net on Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:59:56AM -0800
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:59:56AM -0800, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 01:55:10PM -0500, Dan Malek wrote:
> > >Current implementation just relies on the fact that PCI devices view system
> > >memory the same way as other-bus devices (e.g. OCP devices which sit on
> > >OPB).
> >
> > I don't think so. PCI devices are known to go through bridges, while
> > others are assumed to not.
>
> Well, bridge doesn't necessarily mean there is an address translation :).
> Currently 4xx systems (not sure all, at least ones I use) use PCI == phys
> address mapping, and yes, bridge is setup so this is the case.
Just FYI, not all 4xx systems, just the ones in the kernel tree today.
-Matt
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-01 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 15:59 Problems with dma_alloc_coherent() John Whitney
2004-04-01 16:30 ` John Whitney
2004-04-01 16:51 ` Dan Malek
2004-04-01 17:01 ` Tom Rini
2004-04-01 17:05 ` Matt Porter
2004-04-01 17:51 ` John Whitney
2004-04-01 18:16 ` Matt Porter
2004-04-01 18:19 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-04-01 18:33 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-04-01 18:33 ` John Whitney
2004-04-01 18:40 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-04-01 18:48 ` John Whitney
2004-04-01 18:55 ` Dan Malek
2004-04-01 18:59 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-04-01 19:10 ` John Whitney
2004-04-01 19:17 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-04-01 19:35 ` John Whitney
2004-04-01 20:52 ` Michael R. Zucca
2004-04-01 22:00 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-04-01 22:39 ` Michael R. Zucca
2004-04-02 16:50 ` John Whitney
2004-04-02 18:50 ` Michael R. Zucca
2004-04-02 19:27 ` John Whitney
2004-04-02 20:20 ` Michael R. Zucca
2004-04-02 21:01 ` John Whitney
2004-04-03 7:54 ` Adrian Cox
2004-04-03 12:43 ` John Whitney
2004-04-05 9:05 ` Adrian Cox
2004-04-03 17:33 ` Brad Boyer
2004-04-03 23:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-04-04 8:15 ` Adrian Cox
2004-04-02 22:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-04-03 7:33 ` Adrian Cox
2004-04-04 22:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-04-02 5:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-01 20:49 ` Matt Porter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040401134953.C27472@home.com \
--to=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=jwhitney-linuxppc@sands-edge.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).