From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linas@austin.ibm.com Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:31:17 -0500 To: Tameen Khan Cc: "'Benjamin Herrenschmidt'" , "'linuxppc-dev list'" , hbabu@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: stack frame for interrupts/exceptions in PPC Message-ID: <20040429113117.V58706@forte.austin.ibm.com> References: <1083118036.20092.30.camel@gaston> <008d01c42d48$0baae1a0$273147ab@amer.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <008d01c42d48$0baae1a0$273147ab@amer.cisco.com>; from tameen@cisco.com on Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:41:32AM -0700 Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:41:32AM -0700, Tameen Khan wrote: > > > > > I am tryting to implement kernel backtracing for PPC. > > > > What do you mean ? There is already working backtrace code in > > the kernel, both in the Oops code and in xmon. and KDB too... > Did not know that. Am new to linux and ppc. > I'm porting lkcdutils for PPC. It picks up a kernal core dump and among > other things has to generate backtraces from it. You may want to talk to Haren Myneni who I beleive is also working LKCD on PPC64 --linas ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/