From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@intracom.gr>
Cc: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
Rune Torgersen <runet@innovsys.com>,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: 8260 CPM DP ram free function
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 16:28:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040524142810.CB091C109F@atlas.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 May 2004 17:06:39 +0300." <40B2016F.3070206@intracom.gr>
In message <40B2016F.3070206@intracom.gr> you wrote:
>
> I'll just pop in here and say that I already have & maintain
> a proper dpalloc for 8xx.
Yes, your implementation was the second of the three I am aware of
that have been submitted through this list.
> The argument for not needing modules is not very convincing IMHO.
Do we really need a poll?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de
What was sliced bread the greatest thing since?
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-24 14:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-21 17:35 8260 CPM DP ram free function Rune Torgersen
2004-05-21 19:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-05-24 13:50 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-05-24 14:06 ` Pantelis Antoniou
2004-05-24 14:28 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2004-05-24 15:24 ` Tom Rini
2004-05-21 21:44 ` Dan Malek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-21 19:34 Rune Torgersen
2004-05-21 19:50 ` Tom Rini
2004-05-21 20:16 Rune Torgersen
2004-05-21 20:26 ` Tom Rini
2004-05-21 21:41 Rune Torgersen
2004-05-21 21:52 Rune Torgersen
2004-05-24 16:03 Rune Torgersen
[not found] ` <20040524161520.GQ6763@smtp.west.cox.net>
2004-05-25 11:00 ` Dan Malek
2004-05-25 16:04 Rune Torgersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040524142810.CB091C109F@atlas.denx.de \
--to=wd@denx.de \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=panto@intracom.gr \
--cc=runet@innovsys.com \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).