From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:16:05 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Olaf Hering Cc: Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check Message-ID: <20040610001605.GH18212@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20040605074341.GA15279@suse.de> <20040608112556.GA21447@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20040608112556.GA21447@suse.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:25:56PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 05, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > pomegranate:~# echo dssall | /usr/bin/as -o /tmp/x > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > {standard input}:1: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `dssall' > > pomegranate:~# /usr/bin/as -v > > GNU assembler version 2.15.91.0.1 (powerpc-suse-linux) using BFD version 2.15.91.0.1 20040527 (SuSE Linux) > > > > > > *** 2.6 kernels no longer buildcorrectly with old versions of binutils. > > *** Please upgrade your binutils to 2.12.1 or newer > > make: *** [checkbin] Error 1 > > make: Target `all' not remade because of errors. > > I talked to Alan, and -many is the correct fix. Does the resulting kernel compile (e.g. on a config where we might try and compile a .S file with 'dssall' in it) ? I could be missing it, but is -many passed down to gas by something else now? Otherwise this isn't a correct fix the assembler won't work. :) -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/