From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:15:30 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Tom Rini Cc: Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check Message-ID: <20040614091530.GA18482@suse.de> References: <20040605074341.GA15279@suse.de> <20040608112556.GA21447@suse.de> <20040610001605.GH18212@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20040610001605.GH18212@smtp.west.cox.net> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, Jun 09, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:25:56PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Jun 05, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > pomegranate:~# echo dssall | /usr/bin/as -o /tmp/x > > > {standard input}: Assembler messages: > > > {standard input}:1: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `dssall' > > > pomegranate:~# /usr/bin/as -v > > > GNU assembler version 2.15.91.0.1 (powerpc-suse-linux) using BFD version 2.15.91.0.1 20040527 (SuSE Linux) > > > > > > > > > *** 2.6 kernels no longer buildcorrectly with old versions of binutils. > > > *** Please upgrade your binutils to 2.12.1 or newer > > > make: *** [checkbin] Error 1 > > > make: Target `all' not remade because of errors. > > > > I talked to Alan, and -many is the correct fix. > > Does the resulting kernel compile (e.g. on a config where we might try > and compile a .S file with 'dssall' in it) ? I could be missing it, but > is -many passed down to gas by something else now? Otherwise this isn't > a correct fix the assembler won't work. :) Everyone who wants to build the latest and greatest kernel can also update binutils, its a no-brainer. -- USB is for mice, FireWire is for men! sUse lINUX ag, nÜRNBERG ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/