From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 07:01:27 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Olaf Hering Cc: Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check Message-ID: <20040713140127.GJ16877@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20040615172511.GA21667@suse.de> <20040615174648.GC14528@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040703222918.GA10425@suse.de> <20040704072350.GA7060@suse.de> <20040705183219.GI2146@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040709013429.GN23135@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040712090618.GB32413@suse.de> <20040712151119.GL28002@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040712180321.GB16877@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040713134945.GA5104@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20040713134945.GA5104@suse.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:49:45PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Mon, Jul 12, Tom Rini wrote: > > > +cflags-$(CONFIG_6xx) += -Wa,-maltivec > > That breaks gas 2.14 with gcc 3.4 or gcc 3.5, it passes -mppc, -many to > as and leads to this error: Er, are you sure you got your patches right? Adding -Wa,-maltivec only, shouldn't cause -many to ever show up (and we don't want -many to ever show up, since it is broken on otherwise supported binutils combos). Was this the bigger patch I sent, which sets AFLAGS += $(aflags-y) or something else? -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ** This list is shutting down 7/24/2004.