From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:26:33 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Olaf Hering Cc: Andrew Morton , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix missing option in binutils version check Message-ID: <20040713152633.GL16877@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20040705183219.GI2146@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040709013429.GN23135@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040712090618.GB32413@suse.de> <20040712151119.GL28002@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040712180321.GB16877@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040713134945.GA5104@suse.de> <20040713140127.GJ16877@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040713140220.GA20213@suse.de> <20040713142015.GK16877@smtp.west.cox.net> <20040713151854.GA7858@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20040713151854.GA7858@suse.de> Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:18:54PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, Tom Rini wrote: > > > OK. Perhaps gcc should be refusing to build with older binutils > > perhaps? It sounds like gcc-3.4 + binutils-2.14 or older won't work > > unless we ensure that any -mppc/altivec/etc type flags that gcc itself > > would pass, excluding -many, are re-passed by the kernel itself. > > Its just the 2.14 + gcc 3.4 combo that does not work. > binutils 2.12, 2.13 and 2.15 works ok with gcc 3.4. Does gcc not pass down -many with 2.12/2.13, or does -many actually work there? -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ** This list is shutting down 7/24/2004.