From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 00:44:26 +0200 From: Colin Leroy To: Cedric Pradalier Cc: debian-powerpc@lists.debian.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: adm103x module and 2.6.8 Message-ID: <20040729004426.033e48a3@jack.colino.net> In-Reply-To: <20040728221825.34917851.cedric.pradalier@inrialpes.fr> References: <20040728221825.34917851.cedric.pradalier@inrialpes.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On 28 Jul 2004 at 22h07, Cedric Pradalier wrote: Hi, > I've just seen that from kernel 2.6.8, lm-sensors modules will be > supporting adm1030 and adm1031 thermal control chip. > > As it does not make sense to have two competing modules for the same > piece of hardware, I strongly advise people to test and use these > modules to control the the chip on their ibook2.2, rather than using my > therm_adm103x module. BenH said more than once that he preferred dedicated temperature and fan drivers for mac hardware than generic lm_sensors. The fact your driver still isn't included strikes me as a bit odd, given that mine has been quite quickly. You had positive feedback about therm_adm103x now, and maybe Ben forgot about it? -- Colin http://www.colino.net/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/