linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Ralph Siemsen <rsiemsen@rossvideo.com>
Cc: Linux PPC Dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>,
	Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 44x ethernet MDIO access
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 14:34:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040805143449.D14159@home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41129315.600@rossvideo.com>; from rsiemsen@rossvideo.com on Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:05:41PM -0400


On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 04:05:41PM -0400, Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> Ralph Siemsen wrote:
> > In a related issue, both the PHY read and write functions use a fixed
> > time delay (MDIO_DELAY = 50) presently... it seems I need a longer value
> > on my hardware, and having such hardcoded values is trouble anyways... I
> > suggest we change the code to poll for completion, with a short delay
> > and an upper limit on the number of loops.
>
> I've just checked the hardware, it seems that the MDIO clock is driven
> at EPB clock divided by 10.  So on the IBM eval board its 7.6MHz.  Each
> MDIO transfer involves moving 64 bits of data.  So that means just the
> data transfer (never mind any processing in the PHY) takes 8.4us.
>
> The important part to note is that EPB could vary over a considerable
> range, so the time needed for MDIO is potentially longer than the 50us
> currently used in the code.
>
> Attached is a patch that "works for me" - turns the long udelay() into a
> polling loop with short little delays instead.  This allows MDIO_DELAY
> to be increased to a larger value (say 150) without slowing down most
> systems.
>
> Also I can be used to measure just how long the transfers actually take.
>   If MDIO_DEBUG is enabled then you'll see how many "loops" were
> needed... on the Ocotea board i get values around 25.
>
> -Ralph

Applied (with minor mods).

Ralph, can you take a look at http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/3180
and sign off your future patches accordingly?

Thanks,
Matt


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-05 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-05 19:01 [PATCH] 44x ethernet MDIO access Ralph Siemsen
2004-08-05 20:05 ` Ralph Siemsen
2004-08-05 21:34   ` Matt Porter [this message]
2004-08-06 12:12   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2004-08-06 13:04     ` Ralph Siemsen
2004-08-05 21:23 ` Matt Porter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040805143449.D14159@home.com \
    --to=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=rsiemsen@rossvideo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).