From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 11:02:20 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: Andriy Korud Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Current PPC 2.4 kernel trees? Message-ID: <20040825110220.C9986@home.com> References: <80908CC5B2C9DB47AAF8C77892FCB44315F884@lion.vector.com.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <80908CC5B2C9DB47AAF8C77892FCB44315F884@lion.vector.com.pl>; from a.korud@vector.com.pl on Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:29:56AM +0200 Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 11:29:56AM +0200, Andriy Korud wrote: > > Hi, > can anybody explain which 2.4 kernel trees (especially for PPC) are actual and how are they related with kernel.org's kernel? (I know about Denx's one, any other available, i.e. MontaVista's?). http://penguinppc.org/dev/kernel.shtml has a list of 2.4 trees. linuxppc-2.4 is a direct child of linux-2.4 that has additional functionality not in that kernel.org tree. It has the latest 4xx and 85xx. linuxppc_2_4_devel is a previous 2.4 devel tree that still has some good and bad things in it that might be desired on some platforms. 8xx and 82xx might be better here, IIRC. > I'm currently running 2.6 from kernel.org (PPChameleon board), but for some reason need to downgrade. I've heard of this board..isn't it 4xx? Do you have patches for this against 2.6? It isn't in 2.6 now. -Matt ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/