From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (fed1rmmtao03.cox.net [68.230.241.36]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43882BC0F for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:49:16 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:49:14 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Pantelis Antoniou Message-ID: <20040920174914.GM27914@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20040917100643.53011.qmail@web15608.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> <414AB4A7.2000807@intracom.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <414AB4A7.2000807@intracom.gr> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Song Sam Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.x on 8xx status List-Id: "Linux on PowerPC \(Including Embedded\) Developers Mail List" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:55:51PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Song Sam wrote: > > "Smith, Craig" wrote: > > > > > >>Right now, I just want to know if I should expect to > >>see funny behavior from this particular source tree > >>on an 8xx platform or should it work OK? Thanks so > >>much. > > > > > > Well, as I have tested so far, 2.6.x can only work > > right on 8xx with RAMDISK root file system. As for > > NFS, still no luck. > > Well it could have fooled me since I have it running > right here... > > Don't use the old etherner driver. Note that the old SCC enet driver, in linuxppc-2.5 at least is 'OK'. Not that it couldn't do with a cleanup and netdev person audit, but it's functional enough for me and my rpxlite to mount a root fs. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/