From: Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: New mailing list specifically for embedded PowerPC development
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:08:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040925110818.A11580@home.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096081145.475.12.camel@gaston>; from benh@kernel.crashing.org on Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:59:06PM +1000
On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 12:59:06PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> To reply to Matt, "then where do pmac-specific discussions belong?", well,
> how much pmac specific messages have you seen on linuxppc-dev in the past
> few (monthes/years) ?
Well, I don't have list archives available now to go back and quantify
the pmac messages. It's enough for me to notice it. Obviously, it's
not nearly as many as the endless embedded-specific questions.
In the end, I was merely asking for clarification for where various
messages go. If I cc: linuxppc-embedded with booke core changes I
don't want people bitching that it wasn't on linuxppc-dev and vice
versa.
Again, I ask, what is "general PPC development discussion"? Anything
that doesn't involve an embedded only processor? This includes classic
PPC discussion as long as it's not on an embedded board, right? But
not other PPC processors?
If you asked for the split, I hope you can provide some clarification.
-Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-25 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-23 6:46 New mailing list specifically for embedded PowerPC development Stephen Rothwell
2004-09-23 23:30 ` Tom Rini
2004-09-24 0:31 ` Brian Waite
2004-09-24 1:22 ` Hollis Blanchard
2004-09-24 3:23 ` Tom Rini
2004-09-24 5:52 ` Dan Malek
2004-09-24 16:41 ` Tom Rini
2004-09-25 2:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-25 3:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-25 3:08 ` Owen Stampflee
2004-09-25 18:01 ` Tom Rini
2004-09-25 18:10 ` Matt Porter
2004-09-25 17:57 ` Tom Rini
2004-09-25 23:12 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2004-09-25 18:08 ` Matt Porter [this message]
2004-09-24 1:07 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-09-24 16:48 ` Matt Porter
2004-09-25 18:56 ` Matt Porter
2004-09-26 12:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040925110818.A11580@home.com \
--to=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).