From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0652BDB5 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 01:27:21 +1000 (EST) To: "Robert P. J. Day" From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:10:45 EDT." Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:27:12 +0200 Sender: wd@denx.de Message-Id: <20040925152717.F29D4C108D@atlas.denx.de> Cc: Embedded PPC Linux list Subject: Re: [PATCH] to support choice of 8xx microcode patch List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message you wrote: > > > Where do you select which CPU type gets used, and adjust for the > > corresponfding version of the uCode patch? > > are you referring to the distinction you make in the DENX 2.4 tree, > where you distinguish between 850 and non-850 architectures? since This is one part of what needs to be done. Also, the MPC866 family handles relocation differently. > that appears to be done manually, i see no reason why the same > couldn't be done in the patch i submitted. it would be a trivial > change to get the same effect. You are right. But since you wrote "this is a *full* ... patch" (emphasis by yourself) I somehow expected that you covered this problem, too. Sorry if this was a misunderstanding. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87 Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88 Email: wd@denx.de "The more data I punch in this card, the lighter it becomes, and the lower the mailing cost." - Stan Kelly-Bootle, "The Devil's DP Dictionary"