From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from web53810.mail.yahoo.com (web53810.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.205]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 358062BDA0 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 05:10:07 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <20041013191005.87200.qmail@web53810.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:10:05 -0700 (PDT) From: annamaya To: Mark Chambers , "Robert P. J. Day" , Embedded PPC Linux list In-Reply-To: <005601c4b155$8ae3fbf0$0301a8c0@chuck2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: "I2C" versus "IIC" List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , My vote is for I2C :-) --- Mark Chambers wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert P. J. Day" > To: "Embedded PPC Linux list" > > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 2:26 PM > Subject: "I2C" versus "IIC" > > My vote, since nobody asked, would be "I2C". I've > always heard people > say "I squared C", and since only CBS can get > superscripts out of ASCII > I2C is about as close as you can get. I2C is more > unique and hence > a more readily recognizable acronym. > > But I'm sure we could get about 50/50 voting on > this. > > Mark > > > _______________________________________________ > Linuxppc-embedded mailing list > Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org > https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail