From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (fed1rmmtao10.cox.net [68.230.241.29]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B87D2BD81 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:49:24 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 07:49:22 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "Robert P. J. Day" Message-ID: <20041018144922.GD26624@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20041014224128.GE19791@smtp.west.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: Embedded PPC Linux list Subject: Re: Merge 8xx to Linus tree? List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 07:03:52AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 06:25:54PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > what does this mean in terms of urgency in getting changes into the > > > 8xx stuff, then? does this imply a fixed window of opportunity in the > > > near future, or does it mean that once stuff starts to get moved > > > upstream, it will get moved on a regular basis? just curious. > > > > Once upstream, new changes won't (unless not-fully-baked) go into > > linuxppc-2.5. > > um ... sorry, i'm still not sure what this means. does it mean that, > at some point (to be determined/announced?), the linuxppc-2.5 tree > will be put to the side, and all further mods should be done directly > against the 2.5 tree? As has been the goal for a long time, yes. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/