From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.ebshome.net (gate.ebshome.net [64.81.67.12]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "gate.ebshome.net", Issuer "gate.ebshome.net" (not verified)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA6F2BC0F for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 02:11:51 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 09:11:48 -0700 From: Eugene Surovegin To: "Lawrence E. Bakst" Message-ID: <20041020161148.GA17445@gate.ebshome.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Is linux-2.5-ocp the current 2.6 4xx code base List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 01:02:21AM -0700, Lawrence E. Bakst wrote: > At 4:23 PM -0700 5/14/04, Matt Porter wrote: > >There is a tree, bk://source.mvista.com/linux-2.5-ocp, that has most > >4xx boards working, but it's 2.6.5. The core 4xx support is moving into > >current 2.6, but it will be a little bit longer until important drivers > >like EMAC and IIC are merged into the stock kernel. > > Is the linux-2.5-ocp tree still the right place to get 2.6 4xx code or has that code been moved upstream or someplace else? Linux-2.5-ocp is obsolete. > To be more specific which tree to a "bk clone" to get the latest stuff for 4xx. Use kernel.org's BK tree: bk://linux.bkbits.net/linux-2.5 -- Eugene