From: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@ebshome.net>
To: Gerhard Jaeger <g.jaeger@sysgo.com>,
linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org,
Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi_DOYU@montavista.co.jp>,
Matt Porter <mporter@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] IBM440GX works too slow under nfsroot
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:16:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041025011654.GA3290@gate.ebshome.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041022082955.GA27169@gate.ebshome.net>
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 01:29:55AM -0700, Eugene Surovegin wrote:
> FWIW, I haven't seen any problems when testing my new EMAC driver with
> 100Mb hub, maybe it's only 10Mb related.
>
> Anyway, this is first time I'm hearing about half duplex problems,
> Matt just mentioned them on IRC to me.
>
> I'll try to do some tests this weekend, although I have to admit half
> duplex doesn't seem very important these days, nevertheless, if this
> can be fixed, we better do this :).
OK, I did some tests with 2.4.28-pre4, 2.6.9 & 2.6.9-emac (2.6.9 with
my new EMAC driver). I used Ocotea rev.3 with 440GX rev.C (533MHz).
I can confirm I see some problems in 10HDX mode - there is visible
slow down during system boot up (NFS root). Just after logging into
system, nfsstat shows around 350 retransmits.
My 2.6.9-emac tree doesn't show this behavior, I see no visible
slow-down and nfsstat shows 0 retransmits.
I tried some quick hacks for 2.6.9 driver but was unable to find
settings which could help (my new driver was almost re-written from
scratch and I did a lot of things differently).
For *adventurous*, this new EMAC driver is available as a patch against
2.6.9 BK tree at http://kernel.ebshome.net/. Please, note, it's still
project in progress and it lacks support for all new 440GX features
(GigE, TAH, jumbo frames, EMAC2/EMAC3). This is NAPI version with
correct (I hope) error handling, chip access etc. On Ebony I was able
to route around 144Kpps. I plan to implement support for _some_ 440GX
new features soon (during next month, hopefully).
If there is an interest, I can make a patch against current 2.4 BK
tree, but this will take some time (I'm a little swamped right now).
--
Eugene
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-25 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-21 23:57 [BUG] IBM440GX works too slow under nfsroot Hiroshi DOYU
2004-10-22 1:19 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-10-22 1:26 ` Hiroshi DOYU
2004-10-22 1:33 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-10-22 1:38 ` Hiroshi DOYU
2004-10-22 2:02 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-10-22 6:26 ` Gerhard Jaeger
2004-10-22 8:29 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-10-22 9:39 ` Gerhard Jaeger
2004-10-22 12:22 ` Mark Chambers
2004-10-22 12:27 ` Gerhard Jaeger
2004-10-25 1:16 ` Eugene Surovegin [this message]
2004-10-25 6:47 ` Gerhard Jaeger
2004-10-25 7:02 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-11-08 2:55 ` Eugene Surovegin
2004-10-22 22:22 ` Matt Porter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-22 5:57 Daren Hayward
2004-10-22 6:30 ` Gerhard Jaeger
2004-10-22 7:36 Neil Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041025011654.GA3290@gate.ebshome.net \
--to=ebs@ebshome.net \
--cc=Hiroshi_DOYU@montavista.co.jp \
--cc=g.jaeger@sysgo.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mporter@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).