From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (fed1rmmtao09.cox.net [68.230.241.30]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF59F2BDEB for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 04:25:53 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2004 10:25:51 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: Rick McBain Message-ID: <20041104102551.A12135@home.com> References: <002b01c4c1fb$49adde60$6802a8c0@RicksPresario900> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <002b01c4c1fb$49adde60$6802a8c0@RicksPresario900>; from rick.mcbain@logicsense.com on Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 03:17:27PM -0800 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Linux port for the AMCC (was IBM) 440EP List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 03:17:27PM -0800, Rick McBain wrote: > Does anybody have a working distribution for the 440EP? We were planning > to use a Timesys port, but we've now been told it doesn't exist (after > months of promises it did.). Our other option is to pay US$25K to > MontaVista, but that seems a tad pricey, and our previous experience > with them is that they delivered us an ARM port which fundamentally > didn't work. Since IBM->AMCC did the raw kernel port and toolchain for 440EP, why don't you ask them for it? Then you can roll your own distribution for far cheaper than $25k. What do you need working? There are a lot of new features on 440EP. -Matt