From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from paperstreet.colino.net (colino.net [213.41.131.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0352BDB5 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:26:44 +1100 (EST) Received: from jack.colino.net (jack.colino.net [192.168.0.11]) by paperstreet.colino.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BCB73F5 for ; Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:26:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:26:06 +0100 From: Colin Leroy To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Message-ID: <20041122232606.67d9b2ed@jack.colino.net> In-Reply-To: <1101162053.13597.136.camel@gaston> References: <1101162053.13597.136.camel@gaston> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Test patch for sleep on Aluminium PowerBooks List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 23 Nov 2004 at 09h11, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Hi, > > If filesystems do not need to be "normalized" at sleep, what > > filesystems are known to work? (Hesistant about ext3, as it's quite > > slow, imho, but I'll go that route if needed, I suppose). > > It's not that slow ... It also has the advantages of being natively big-endian, giving us ppc users a bit more speed :) -- \|/ ____ \|/ Colin "@'/ ,. \`@" http://www.geekounet.org/ /_| \__/ |_\ \__U_/