From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (fed1rmmtao10.cox.net [68.230.241.29]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34672BDB5 for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2004 05:08:38 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 11:08:36 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: "Barbier, Renaud (GE Infrastructure)" Message-ID: <20041203110836.B25168@home.com> References: <45ABD2373C33C4459D42B40EC4F346F20482F5DA@FTWMLVEM03.e2k.ad.ge.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <45ABD2373C33C4459D42B40EC4F346F20482F5DA@FTWMLVEM03.e2k.ad.ge.com>; from Renaud.Barbier@ge.com on Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:45:25AM -0600 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: 440GX MMU problem List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 11:45:25AM -0600, Barbier, Renaud (GE Infrastructure) wrote: > the memory test from U-boot does not complain as well as vxWorks. > > I will do my own test anyway. >>From experience, these simple memory tests are often not sufficient...i.e. they can pass even with incorrect timing. -Matt