From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (fed1rmmtao03.cox.net [68.230.241.36]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD772BF13 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 10:13:08 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 16:13:07 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "Povolotsky, Alexander" Message-ID: <20041223231307.GT15219@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0A647400@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0A647400@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com> Cc: "'linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org'" Subject: Re: simple bootloader vs 2.6.10-rc3 for 8xx vs I2C based EEPROM !!! List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 05:21:46PM -0500, Povolotsky, Alexander wrote: > Hi, > > Would below (from Dan Malek) explain why on my 8xx board with I2C EEPROM > (which ptobably does not work on 2.6.10-rc3) the simple bootloader fails to > load the kernel ? If the board you've selected does not have any meaningful functions in embed_config.c, yes, it probably would. If this is a custom board, or something not otherwise supported by the standard kernel, it sounds like some other parts of your 2.4 code, under arch/ppc/boot/ have not been ported over yet. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/