From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net (fed1rmmtao04.cox.net [68.230.241.35]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CBC82BF07 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:53:54 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:53:48 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "Povolotsky, Alexander" Message-ID: <20041224065348.GA1873@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0A647402@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <313680C9A886D511A06000204840E1CF0A647402@whq-msgusr-02.pit.comms.marconi.com> Cc: "'linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org'" Subject: Re: simple bootloader vs 2.6.10-rc3 for 8xx vs I2C based EEPROM ! !! List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:32:58PM -0500, Povolotsky, Alexander wrote: > > Sorry for keeping annoying with questions ! > > arch\ppc\8xx_io\uart.c - is it suppose to exist in 2.6.10-rc3 ? No, it's been replaced by CONFIG_SERIAL_CPM. > Also the question from my previous e-mail, which was not answered - does the > simple bootloader has any debugging print statements ( prior to calling > "load_kernel(...)" function), which I could enable ? (how ?) No, it does not. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/