From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from protonic.xs4all.nl (protonic.xs4all.nl [213.84.116.84]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694162BF0E for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 22:55:59 +1100 (EST) Received: from linux.local (linux.local [192.168.1.97]) by protonic.xs4all.nl (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with ESMTP id 49140D403B for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:45:07 +0100 (CET) From: David Jander To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:55:55 +0100 References: <43395BE65409D911B9FF00110A9BFFDC9F851C@zwg57exm01.ea.mot.com> In-Reply-To: <43395BE65409D911B9FF00110A9BFFDC9F851C@zwg57exm01.ea.mot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200501121255.56374.david.jander@protonic.nl> Subject: Re: MPC8xx: Using SCM/SCC and standard 16C550 Uarts together... List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wednesday 12 January 2005 10:59, Demke Torsten-atd012 wrote: > I dont know exactly the state of the DENX kernel, but in the standard > kernel the 8xx UART driver and the 16550 driver are using the same > device numbers (TTY_MAJOR) and device names (/dev/ttySx). > You have to change one of them. You are right! What now? I cannot go around and change TTY_MAJOR! Is it true then, that you normally cannot have a mix of non-16550 uarts and 16550 uarts on the same system, without doing nonstandard things with major numbers? Should maybe arch/ppc/8xx_io/uart.c use another major number? Greetings, -- David Jander Protonic Holland.