From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (fed1rmmtao09.cox.net [68.230.241.30]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98672BDB5 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 03:26:51 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:26:38 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: "Goforth, Edward" Message-ID: <20050113092638.B25004@home.com> References: <9A48EF7239039B48834A3F6B644B0C71EF8750@vaff06-mail01.ad.gd-ais.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <9A48EF7239039B48834A3F6B644B0C71EF8750@vaff06-mail01.ad.gd-ais.com>; from Ed.Goforth@gd-ais.com on Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:14:20AM -0500 Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: board with no RTC List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:14:20AM -0500, Goforth, Edward wrote: > Thanks to everyone who responded. Now that a RTC is not a requirement, > can anyone offer advice on what I will need to do to get the kernel > (2.4.18) to play nice? Are you using the linuxppc-2.4 tree? If you want up to date 2.4 4xx support you should be using that tree as a starting point. Support is better yet in 2.6 where most developers are spending their time. -Matt