From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6C62BDF2 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:31:48 +1100 (EST) To: Clemens Koller From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:50:56 +0100." <41E7A410.6060008@anagramm.de> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:31:21 +0100 Sender: wd@denx.de Message-Id: <20050114113126.434C4C108D@atlas.denx.de> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.x to MPC8540/Microsys Board List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message <41E7A410.6060008@anagramm.de> you wrote: > > Now I 've tried the official 2.6.10 Kernel and (cross-)compiled it > within ELDK 3.1 (btw: is there any difference in between ppc_6xx- and > ppc_82xx- ?) which works fine, too. ppc_82xx is a symbolic link ppc_6xx > Which is the best Kernel source tree to start porting 2.6.x to the pm854 > platform? I would prefer to stuck with the official sources. Is that a > good idea? Yes. > Is it a good idea to just 'copy' the pm854 platform specific files (PCI > initialization and some MTD driver options) to the 2.6.10 tree and see > how it works? Copy from where? from 2.4? No. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de A fail-safe circuit will destroy others. -- Klipstein