From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com (mailout01.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B75D2BDB5 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 03:03:09 +1100 (EST) To: Clemens Koller From: Wolfgang Denk Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:36:39 +0100." <41E7D8F7.4060901@anagramm.de> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:02:29 +0100 Sender: wd@denx.de Message-Id: <20050114160234.3FC70C108D@atlas.denx.de> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.x to MPC8540/Microsys Board List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , In message <41E7D8F7.4060901@anagramm.de> you wrote: > > >>Which is the best Kernel source tree to start porting 2.6.x to the pm854 > >>platform? I would prefer to stuck with the official sources. Is that a > >>good idea? > > > > Yes. > > Thank you, that's what I wanted to hear :-) Note that I didn't comment on using 2.6 in the first place. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de F u cn rd ths u cnt spl wrth a dm!