From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from Mancubus.xs4all.nl (mancubus.xs4all.nl [213.84.146.227]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D1767A70 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 05:05:37 +1100 (EST) From: David Jander To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 19:47:16 +0100 References: <20050119164938.72597.qmail@web53803.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050119164938.72597.qmail@web53803.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200501191947.16167.david.jander@protonic.nl> Subject: Re: FW: cpm_spi.c under kernel 2.6 List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wednesday 19 January 2005 17:49, annamaya wrote: > That reminds me that I need to make the spi driver > available somewhere all the time. But I am not sure > when I will be able to do that. Meanwhile, you should > be able to start of with the old driver for the 8xx > that should be around somewhere under the rubble. :-) > Or, you can start off with the sample code in u-boot > that was derived from the original driver. I just wanted to add, that if anyone is going to get busy again with the 8xx SPI driver(s) in u-boot and linux-2.4, I'd like to know, since I am too. In u-boot there are two 8xx-SPI-drivers, one software and one in hardware, and they seem both broken now (I'm still using CVS versions around 1.1.2 somewhere maybe I should cvs update :-) Specifically spi_xmit() get each other in the way. There are two such functions in u-boot, both non-static and with (very) different prototypes, so I am starting to figure out the best way of fixing that mess. Is anyone busy with the same task? Greetings, -- David Jander Protonic Holland.