From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (fed1rmmtao02.cox.net [68.230.241.37]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982B067A6E for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:47:12 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:47:08 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "Mark A. Greer" Message-ID: <20050120234708.GF2626@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <20050118161515.GI28724@smtp.west.cox.net> <93780AB0-696D-11D9-81BE-003065F9B7DC@embeddededge.com> <20050118181330.GJ28724@smtp.west.cox.net> <41ED5C51.8020809@mvista.com> <20050118190848.GM28724@smtp.west.cox.net> <41ED66D0.2090506@mvista.com> <20050119180841.GP28724@smtp.west.cox.net> <41F01A23.2090907@mvista.com> <20050120225321.GB2626@smtp.west.cox.net> <41F03CEA.2030703@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <41F03CEA.2030703@mvista.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Option to disable mapping genrtc calls to ppc_md calls List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 04:21:14PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: > > >Why ask the user for something you know he wants? If they've selected > >GENRTC and are using the board, they'll probably want GENRTC to work. > >It's exactly what you described except the user won't have to know about > >anything going on. > > If that's the way you want to go then it should depend on having the rtc > "driver" selected and rtc.h should look something like: I don't know how we talked past eachother, but it would look exactly like it did in your patch. The only thing is that you don't ask the user, you make use of what the user told you already. This is a nice new feature of the 2.6 kconfig system. This is what I'm asking you to change from your first patch. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/