From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D555067A45 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:44:58 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:44:38 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Mark A. Greer" Message-ID: <20050121094438.GA18682@lst.de> References: <41EC29A8.1040703@mvista.com> <1106259956.18397.10.camel@gaston> <41F0449C.5020603@mvista.com> <1106265672.5387.14.camel@gaston> <41F04849.70506@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <41F04849.70506@mvista.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev list Subject: Re: [RFC] Option to disable mapping genrtc calls to ppc_md calls List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 05:09:45PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > >In any case, as I wrote, the proper solution is to update genrtc to > >define rtc_ops so that you get both a) and b), it shouldn't be hard to > >update the archs using it. > > > > > > Yes but as I wrote, I don't have time right now. You could have easily implemented it in the time you wasted arguing here.