* Which kernel tree for future 8xx development?
@ 2005-02-17 15:50 David Jander
2005-02-17 17:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Jander @ 2005-02-17 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-embedded
Hi,
Which (of the many) is the most recommended 2.4.x tree for mpc8xx devices
(specially the MPC852T). We are developing our own board-support stuff and
drivers (it's a custom board designed by us).
Currently we have linuxppc-2_4_devel from DENX cvs and linuxppc-2_4_devel from
bitkeeper, which seems to be a newer kernel version, but with much less
different boards supported and less features for motorola powerpc processors.
What's the status of CPM driver stuff for instance?
We started on DENX kernel sources and switched to bitkeeper because of some
misinterpreted advice I received from this list about an unrelated problem,
only to find apparently less mpc8xx support.
Now I am observing myself doing apparently absurd things as for example taking
arch/ppc/8260_io/cpm_spi.c from DENX and putting it into arch/ppc/8xx_io/
from bitkeeper and hacking until it works (again). It still doesn't. Where on
earth is the original driver (which was for MPC860, not MPC8260)!??
Before we port all of our stuff once again from one tree to another, can
someone please give me a good advice on which way to go now and in forseeable
future?
One day I'd like to be able to make all our board-support stuff into something
useful for others and go beg for inclusion in the main sources.... but where?
Greetings,
--
David Jander
Protonic Holland.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Which kernel tree for future 8xx development?
2005-02-17 15:50 Which kernel tree for future 8xx development? David Jander
@ 2005-02-17 17:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Denk @ 2005-02-17 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Jander; +Cc: linuxppc-embedded
In message <200502171650.53799.david.jander@protonic.nl> you wrote:
>
>
> Now I am observing myself doing apparently absurd things as for example taking
> arch/ppc/8260_io/cpm_spi.c from DENX and putting it into arch/ppc/8xx_io/
> from bitkeeper and hacking until it works (again). It still doesn't. Where on
> earth is the original driver (which was for MPC860, not MPC8260)!??
That's probably arch/ppc/8xx_io/cpm_spi.c from our old linux-2.4
kernelk tree.
> Before we port all of our stuff once again from one tree to another, can
> someone please give me a good advice on which way to go now and in forseeable
> future?
I cannot answer this question - maybe once there is a clear split
between stable and development kernel trees again. At the moment
there is only chaos.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
See us @ Embedded World, Nuremberg, Feb 22 - 24, Hall 10.0 Booth 310
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
Mr. Cole's Axiom:
The sum of the intelligence on the planet is a constant;
the population is growing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-17 17:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-17 15:50 Which kernel tree for future 8xx development? David Jander
2005-02-17 17:48 ` Wolfgang Denk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).