From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (fed1rmmtao09.cox.net [68.230.241.30]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DAF67A86 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:18:11 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:18:09 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: James Chapman Message-ID: <20050224141809.GP345@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <421CEC19.2010703@katalix.com> <20050223222534.GM345@smtp.west.cox.net> <421D97FE.4080100@katalix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <421D97FE.4080100@katalix.com> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: PATCH: add ppc PVR register values for 7447A and 7457 CPUs List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:01:50AM +0000, James Chapman wrote: > Tom Rini wrote: > > >On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 08:48:25PM +0000, James Chapman wrote: > > > >>Signed-off-by: James Chapman > >> > >>Trivial patch to add 7447A and 7457 CPU defs. > > > > > >Why? Most of the PVR definitions here can be removed (*muttering about > >85xx ones being added). > > > > I'm in the process of submitting a patch for a new board (Radstone > PPC7D). Since other boards test CPU type using definitions in this file, > I was trying to be consistent. > > If the community don't think those definitions are useful, I'll just > move the ones I need into my board support stuff. Is there something you can't get from cur_cpu_spec[0] ? That's why all of the PVR definitions _should_ be unneeded now. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/