* Is emu10k1 broken in ppc ?
@ 2005-03-04 1:01 Ken Moffat
2005-03-04 17:00 ` Sven Luther
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ken Moffat @ 2005-03-04 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev
First noticed this earlier this week, trying to upgrade my iBook from
2.6.8 to 2.6.11-rc5, using a debian config. At that point, it didn't
seem important to me. Bit me again tonight when I tried to get my
AmigaOne up to 2.6.10 from 2.6.9 using my existing config. The case
labels are SNDRV_EMU10K1_CODE_POKE and SNDRV_EMU10K1_CODE_PEEK, neither
the header nor the code changed between 2.6.9 and 2.6.10.
sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c: In function `snd_emu10k1_fx8010_ioctl':
sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c:2055: error: case label does not reduce to an int=
eger constant
sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.c:2068: error: case label does not reduce to an int=
eger constant
make[3]: *** [sound/pci/emu10k1/emufx.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [sound/pci/emu10k1] Error 2
make[1]: *** [sound/pci] Error 2
make: *** [sound] Error 2
Any clues, please ? Definitions from emu10k1.h are
#define SNDRV_EMU10K1_IOCTL_CODE_POKE=09_IOW ('H', 0x11, emu10k1_fx8010_cod=
e_t)
#define SNDRV_EMU10K1_IOCTL_CODE_PEEK=09_IOWR('H', 0x12, emu10k1_fx8010_cod=
e_t)
Ken
--=20
das eine Mal als Trag=F6die, das andere Mal als Farce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Is emu10k1 broken in ppc ?
2005-03-04 1:01 Is emu10k1 broken in ppc ? Ken Moffat
@ 2005-03-04 17:00 ` Sven Luther
2005-03-04 17:37 ` Ken Moffat
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sven Luther @ 2005-03-04 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ken Moffat; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:01:40AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> First noticed this earlier this week, trying to upgrade my iBook from
> 2.6.8 to 2.6.11-rc5, using a debian config. At that point, it didn't
> seem important to me. Bit me again tonight when I tried to get my
> AmigaOne up to 2.6.10 from 2.6.9 using my existing config. The case
> labels are SNDRV_EMU10K1_CODE_POKE and SNDRV_EMU10K1_CODE_PEEK, neither
> the header nor the code changed between 2.6.9 and 2.6.10.
This was fixed in the debian kernel. Try ou debian's kernel-source-2.6.10, or
get the patch from debian's svn.debian.org kernel repo archive.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Is emu10k1 broken in ppc ?
2005-03-04 17:00 ` Sven Luther
@ 2005-03-04 17:37 ` Ken Moffat
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ken Moffat @ 2005-03-04 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sven Luther; +Cc: linuxppc-dev
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 01:01:40AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > First noticed this earlier this week, trying to upgrade my iBook from
> > 2.6.8 to 2.6.11-rc5, using a debian config. At that point, it didn't
> > seem important to me. Bit me again tonight when I tried to get my
> > AmigaOne up to 2.6.10 from 2.6.9 using my existing config. The case
> > labels are SNDRV_EMU10K1_CODE_POKE and SNDRV_EMU10K1_CODE_PEEK, neither
> > the header nor the code changed between 2.6.9 and 2.6.10.
>
> This was fixed in the debian kernel. Try ou debian's kernel-source-2.6.10=
, or
> get the patch from debian's svn.debian.org kernel repo archive.
>
> Friendly,
>
> Sven Luther
>
Thanks, Sven. I'll do that.
Ken
--=20
das eine Mal als Trag=F6die, das andere Mal als Farce
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-04 17:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-03-04 1:01 Is emu10k1 broken in ppc ? Ken Moffat
2005-03-04 17:00 ` Sven Luther
2005-03-04 17:37 ` Ken Moffat
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).