From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from xyzzy.farnsworth.org (unknown [65.200.49.142]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5C1767A85 for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 12:01:03 +1100 (EST) From: "Dale Farnsworth" Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 18:00:58 -0700 To: Sven Luther Message-ID: <20050307010058.GB22642@xyzzy> References: <20050224082508.GA30005@pegasos> <421DF2B8.6040007@mvista.com> <20050224160411.GA11197@pegasos> <20050224172420.GA6932@xyzzy> <20050305192752.GA28491@pegasos> <20050305203254.GB30151@pegasos> <20050305225128.GC16904@xyzzy> <20050306070248.GA6673@pegasos> <20050306102924.GA32386@xyzzy> <20050306191034.GA10975@pegasos> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20050306191034.GA10975@pegasos> Cc: Nicolas DET , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][PPC32] mv64x60 updates List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 08:10:34PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 03:29:24AM -0700, Dale Farnsworth wrote: > > MV64360 is in arch/ppc/Kconfig, and is currently defined for KATANA and > > CHESTNUT. If I understand correctly, it should be defined for any > > board using the MV64360. I don't think we want the PPC_CHRP dependency. > > Ah, i guess that was the missing bit. Basically i need to set MV64360 for my > board, but since it is a generic PPC_CHRP, how is that supposed to work ? > > Could you send me maybe a list of files which need merging yet, compared to > 2.6.11 ? I guess it just doesn't work because i am missing pieces. I would be guessing, since I've focused on the ethernet driver. Mark Greer has done the core mv64[34]60 core support. Nicholas is working with regarding Pegasos II support. > The pegasos has the mv64360 registers mapped at 0xf1000000, and the ports > (only port1 is wired though) mapped at interrupt 9, shared with other devices. > I guess that would be the only real difference with the other currently > supported hardware, right ? Nicholas implied that the PCI IRQs are different as well. -Dale