From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (fed1rmmtao11.cox.net [68.230.241.28]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E1267A46 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:03:38 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:03:27 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: Gerhard Jaeger Message-ID: <20050310090327.A27661@cox.net> References: <0007F077BB3476449151699150E8FEA205928C@exchange.tsi-telsys.com> <200503100837.08717.g.jaeger@sysgo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <200503100837.08717.g.jaeger@sysgo.com>; from g.jaeger@sysgo.com on Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:37:08AM +0100 Cc: Sanjay Bajaj , linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: PPC 440GX with NS DP83865 phy List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:37:08AM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:11, Sanjay Bajaj wrote: > > Has anybody used PPC 440GX with NS DP83865 phy? If you have or have any > > information to set it up, please share. > > > We're using this PHY on a custom 440GX board. Connected via GMII! > After setting up the RGMII bridge correctly (see manual), you also have to > tweak the EMAC driver. I have sent a patch (which has been rejected) a few > weeks ago to the list which changes the setup procedure of the EMAC to work > with a DP83865 PHY. THe current implementation will not work. FWIW, I did go back and see the patch from 22 October in my mbox. It's not rejected...just missed amongst a lot of other things. If things are quiet, it's best to ping in case somebody missed your patch. Thanks, Matt