From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.sysgo.com (mail.sysgo.com [62.8.134.5]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E7767A6B for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:24:08 +1100 (EST) From: Gerhard Jaeger To: Matt Porter Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:24:00 +0100 References: <0007F077BB3476449151699150E8FEA205928C@exchange.tsi-telsys.com> <200503100837.08717.g.jaeger@sysgo.com> <20050310090327.A27661@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20050310090327.A27661@cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200503101724.00567.g.jaeger@sysgo.com> Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: PPC 440GX with NS DP83865 phy List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 10 March 2005 17:03, Matt Porter wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 08:37:08AM +0100, Gerhard Jaeger wrote: > > On Wednesday 09 March 2005 18:11, Sanjay Bajaj wrote: > > > Has anybody used PPC 440GX with NS DP83865 phy? If you have or have any > > > information to set it up, please share. > > > > > We're using this PHY on a custom 440GX board. Connected via GMII! > > After setting up the RGMII bridge correctly (see manual), you also have to > > tweak the EMAC driver. I have sent a patch (which has been rejected) a few > > weeks ago to the list which changes the setup procedure of the EMAC to work > > with a DP83865 PHY. THe current implementation will not work. > > FWIW, I did go back and see the patch from 22 October in my mbox. It's > not rejected...just missed amongst a lot of other things. If things > are quiet, it's best to ping in case somebody missed your patch. > Matt - no problem. The answer in october, I got from Eugene was, that you guys are working on a "new" EMAC driver with NAPI support and I also had a running setup - so - no worries ;) Gerhard