From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (fed1rmmtao12.cox.net [68.230.241.27]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6E567A71 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:14:08 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:14:03 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: Kumar Gala Message-ID: <20050316221402.GA8345@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <1110907039.24673.12.camel@rhino.az.mvista.com> <1110915063.5937.93.camel@ad.doubleclick.net> <583185c11becaca3ce73e4010c18154d@freescale.com> <1110925103.5937.107.camel@ad.doubleclick.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Cc: linuxppc-embedded Subject: Re: 440EP FPU patch List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 01:22:48AM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > Jason, > > Is it possible to make this against a newer tree (like a current bk > pull). The patch doesn't apply cleanly against head.S, which I'm > guessing is due to the SPRN changes pushed upstream recently. > > If I can apply it cleanly, I will get it pushed upstream. Can one of you run say LTP on a classic box, just as a sanity test before pushing? If not, lemme know and I'll do it :) -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/